HOME/monitors/COMPARE
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Gigabyte M27Q X vs LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

Compare Gigabyte M27Q X vs LG UltraGear 27GS95QE, see the clear winner, and pick the better fit for monitors buyers in 2026.

OVERALL WINNER
Gigabyte

Gigabyte M27Q X

PROS
  • + High HDR brightness
  • + Color-accurate from factory
View on Amazon
LG

LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

PROS
  • + Blazing fast pixel response
View on Amazon

THE VERDICT

M27Q X is the stronger buy for most people because it combines the broader spec lead with a more defensible price. UltraGear 27GS95QE is not a bad pick, but it only makes more sense if its narrower strengths line up exactly with your workload.

Buy M27Q X if you want the safest all-round choice in this price tier.
Pick UltraGear 27GS95QE only when one of its standout strengths matters more than balanced value.
Do not compare these two in isolation; keep your actual budget ceiling in view.

CRITERIA BREAKDOWN

Price Positioning

Gigabyte M27Q X
LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

M27Q X is the easier buy if your goal is maximum value efficiency in this segment.

Overall Score

Gigabyte M27Q X
LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

M27Q X carries the stronger OverLKD score and therefore the broader all-round recommendation.

Resolution

Gigabyte M27Q X
LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

Both products are close enough on resolution that this row is not a deciding factor alone.

Refresh Rate

Gigabyte M27Q X
LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

Both products are close enough on refresh rate that this row is not a deciding factor alone.

Panel

Gigabyte M27Q X
LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

Both products are close enough on panel that this row is not a deciding factor alone.

Ports

Gigabyte M27Q X
LG UltraGear 27GS95QE

UltraGear 27GS95QE leads on ports based on the harder spec line.

THE BIG DIFFERENCES

  • M27Q X wins the value argument while keeping the gap to UltraGear 27GS95QE within the same budget segment.
  • M27Q X leads on Response Time: 0.5ms.
  • UltraGear 27GS95QE still has a case if you care more about ports than balanced value.
SPECGigabyte M27Q XLG UltraGear 27GS95QEREADOUT
Resolution2560x1440 QHD2560x1440 QHDBoth products are close enough on resolution that this row is not a deciding factor alone.
Refresh Rate240Hz240HzBoth products are close enough on refresh rate that this row is not a deciding factor alone.
PanelIPSOLEDBoth products are close enough on panel that this row is not a deciding factor alone.
PortsHDMI 2.0, DP 1.4, USB-CHDMI 2.1, DP 1.4, USB-CUltraGear 27GS95QE leads on ports based on the harder spec line.
Size27"27"Both products are close enough on size that this row is not a deciding factor alone.
Response Time0.5ms0.03msM27Q X leads on response time based on the harder spec line.
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR True Black 400Both products are close enough on hdr that this row is not a deciding factor alone.

SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATIONS
BEST OVERALL
Gigabyte M27Q X
EXCELLENT ALTERNATIVE
LG UltraGear 27GS95QE
ACTIONView on Amazon ↗View on Amazon ↗
OVERLKD SCORE
47/100
48/100
SIZE27"27"
PANELIPSOLED
RESOLUTION2560x1440 QHD2560x1440 QHD
REFRESH RATE240Hz240Hz
RESPONSE TIME0.5ms0.03ms
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR True Black 400
PORTSHDMI 2.0, DP 1.4, USB-CHDMI 2.1, DP 1.4, USB-C

BUYING TAKEAWAY

If you want the shortest answer: buy M27Q X unless UltraGear 27GS95QE's specific advantage is exactly what you need.

Winner: Gigabyte M27Q X